Buddhist & Jain mythology

The Foolish Friend

At a Glance

  • Central figures: A king and his loyal but foolish attendant, identified as the Bodhisatta in a past life as the king himself.
  • Setting: The royal court of Benares, from the Pali Jataka collection.
  • The turn: The king’s devoted servant, tasked with guarding the king while he sleeps, spots a fly on the king’s chest and strikes it with a sword.
  • The outcome: The king is gravely wounded by the blow meant to protect him, and the servant is dismissed from the court.
  • The legacy: The story became a standard parable in Buddhist teaching on the danger of devotion without wisdom - that loyalty paired with foolishness causes more harm than open enmity.

A fly landed on the king’s chest. It sat there, cleaning its legs, while the king of Benares slept through the heat of the afternoon on a couch spread with white linen. His body rose and fell with each breath. The fly did not move.

The king’s personal attendant stood over him with a fan of palm leaves, watching the fly. He had served the king since boyhood. He loved the king the way a dog loves a master - completely, without reservation, and without much thought. He was strong, obedient, and spectacularly stupid.

The Attendant and the Sword

The attendant’s name does not survive, but his devotion was famous in the palace at Benares. He carried the king’s sandals. He tasted the king’s food before each meal. He slept across the threshold of the king’s chamber so that no one could enter without stepping over his body. When the king rode out on his elephant, the attendant walked alongside with a parasol, and when the king sat in the judgment hall, the attendant stood behind the throne with a drawn sword - not because he was a soldier, but because the king found his presence reassuring.

The courtiers tolerated him. He was harmless enough when left to simple tasks. But several ministers had warned the king that the man’s judgment was poor. He had once thrown a plate of food at a visiting brahmin because the brahmin sneezed near the king and the attendant mistook it for an attack. Another time he had locked the queen’s maidservants in a storeroom because they were carrying scissors and he thought scissors near the royal apartments constituted a threat.

The king laughed these incidents off. The man was loyal. What more could you ask?

The Fly on the King’s Chest

On the afternoon in question, the king had eaten well and retired to his private chamber. He told the attendant to fan him while he slept. The attendant took up his position, fanning steadily, and the king closed his eyes.

The fly came in through the lattice. It circled the room twice and landed on the king’s forehead. The attendant waved it off with the fan. It returned. He waved again. It returned again, this time settling on the king’s nose. The attendant brushed it away. The fly lifted, looped once around the attendant’s head as if taunting him, and landed squarely on the king’s bare chest, just below the collarbone.

The attendant fanned. The fly held. He fanned harder. The fly gripped the fine hairs of the king’s chest and would not be dislodged. The attendant’s face reddened. He fanned with both hands. The fly sat.

Now the attendant grew angry. He had been given a task - protect the king’s rest - and this fly was defying him. He set down the fan. He looked around the room. The king’s sword lay on a low table near the couch, its blade freshly oiled, its edge bright.

The attendant picked up the sword.

He raised it over his head with both hands, aimed carefully at the fly on the king’s chest, and brought the blade down with the full force of his considerable arms.

The Blow

The fly, being a fly, lifted off at the last instant.

The sword struck the king across the chest. The linen split. The skin opened. Blood ran onto the white couch. The king screamed and woke. The attendant stood over him holding the bloody sword with an expression of tremendous frustration - not because he had cut the king, but because the fly had escaped.

Servants rushed in. The court physician was summoned. The wound was long but not deep enough to kill, though it would leave a scar from the king’s left shoulder to the center of his ribs. As the physician worked, the king - teeth clenched, sweat running into his eyes - looked up at his attendant and asked the obvious question.

Why?

The attendant explained. There had been a fly. The fly would not leave. He had done what seemed necessary to remove it.

The king said nothing for a long time. The physician tied off the bandage. The servants cleaned the blood from the floor. The attendant stood in the corner, still holding the sword, still looking aggrieved about the fly.

The King’s Judgment

When the physician left, the king called his chief minister. He told the minister what had happened. The minister, who had warned the king about this man more than once, kept his face neutral and waited.

The king said: Send him away. Give him money for the road. Give him food. But he is not to return to the palace.

The minister asked whether the man should be punished. The king shook his head. The man had meant no harm. That was the entire problem - he had meant no harm, and he had nearly killed the king. A man who means you harm, you can guard against. A man who means you well but has no sense, you cannot guard against, because you do not see him coming. You trust him. You let him stand over you with a sword while you sleep.

The attendant was brought in and told. He wept. He threw himself at the king’s feet. He swore he would never strike at another fly. The king, wincing as the movement pulled at his wound, told him gently to go.

The Bodhisatta’s Words

The Buddha told this story at Jetavana, the monastery near Savatthi, to a group of bhikkhus who had been discussing a well-meaning but clumsy monk who had caused trouble in the Sangha through sheer incompetence. The monk had mixed up the alms schedule, accidentally insulted a patron, and somehow managed to set fire to the edge of the meditation hall while trying to light a lamp.

The bhikkhus were debating whether good intentions were sufficient. The Buddha said they were not.

He identified himself as the king in the story - the Bodhisatta in a former birth. The foolish attendant, he said, had been reborn many times since, always devoted, always dangerous. An enemy with sense does less damage than a friend without it. The enemy you watch. The friend you let close.

He did not say what became of the fly.